All posts in Atheism

3W5K

Throw The Christians To The Lions

Upon my return from India with Compassion International, I was reeling a bit, wondering how to share what I had just experienced.  It was truly the most overwhelming and life-changing span of days outside of the birth of my son.  I didn’t need to find a way to sum it all up.. I needed a starting point.

On the drive home from SFO, after an almost 30hr travel day from Kolkata, we pulled up at a red light where I saw, stuck on the car in front of us, a bumper sticker reading “So many Christians, so few lions.”

I’d found my starting point.

The predicate of the bumper sticker was that Christians, as a group, ought to be fed to the lions. Unfortunately, there are just too many Christians to effectively do so. So I got to thinking: If we want to eradicate Christians, we would have to do it in a more organized manner; we’d have to line us up and toss us in a few at a time.

Which leads to the question “Who would go first?

The easy target would be the Catholics, who are often the focus of severe cultural critique, even by their own Christian family.  Of course, by throwing all the Catholics to the lions, we’d be eradicating members of the most charitable organization in human history… yet that wouldn’t be the major obstacle; the major obstacle remains the sheer number of Catholics. So, in the interests of expediency, perhaps we ought to begin by tossing in the small group of Catholic nuns I met in Kolkata who, as common practice, walk around the block upon which their convent is situated and pick up abandoned infants from the street and then nurse them back to health to the best of their ability. This would include the infant child I almost stepped on with my own feet, left covered in a pile of rags with only its tiny hand exposed.  Perhaps we ought to begin with that group of Christians.

Or perhaps we move on to a different institution and begin by tossing in any of the Protestant pastors I met in India who, supported by Compassion’s Child Survival Project, facilitate programs for pregnant mothers and their children, regardless of the fact that neither those women nor their husbands attend those churches much less tithe to keep those churches running. You see, most of these women are from Hindu and Muslim families and have no interest in Christianity per se. They are also, in large part, members of India’s Untouchable caste; a people who are regarded as sub-human by the dominant forces in their culture.  They are regarded as next-to-worthless beings whose only hope is to die and return on as a member of the higher castes. Yet, these  Protestant pastors believe that all people are children of the Father and therefore worth helping. Particularly, they believe that motherhood is a sacred vocation and worth investing time, finances and resources.

We could begin with these pastors.

Or perhaps we could begin with any of the Christian men and women who, along with WIlliam Wilberforce, launched and sustained the first abolitionist movement. Or any of the Christians who have launched and are sustaining  the second great abolitionist movement, happening right before our eyes.

Of course, I am assuming that the maker of the sticker and the driver of the car it was stuck on would not want to begin with anyone on the above list. The work of the lives I’ve mentioned is far too good to throw away… or at least good enough to keep them from being thrown away first.  Rather, I imagine they’d suggest beginning with someone more like me; someone whose life is more compromised. Someone who has injured people with his expression of faith or at least used his faith as an excuse and coverup for having injuring people; in a word: a hypocrite.

But, if we decided on throwing some lesser member of the Christian Family to the lions, I believe we would have a problem..

I believe firmly that, as we drug some lesser sister or brother to the pit to be consumed, one of our greater sisters or brothers would intercede and demand that they should be taken instead. They would do so for the very reason the do the great works of compassion and justice that would otherwise qualify them for exclusion from being thrown to the lions; they are Christians and are compelled by the Person of Jesus Christ both externally and internally.

You see, the Christians I know and have personally met who do these compelling and moving works do not do so simply because the work needs doing; they do so because they have followed Jesus into such work.  They are compelled and inspired by the teachings and spirit of Jesus to care for those He called “the least.”

So, It strikes me that if we want to throw “the Christians” to the lions, we might as well begin with the best among us and, with them, the work of their lives.  In my experience, why I do what I do makes what I do sustainable. When the thrill of doing a good work wears off (and it always does) my reason for doing it remains. I join my greater sisters and brothers in acknowledging that I do what I do because I am compelled by Jesus Christ. 

Thoughts On The Passing of Christopher Hitchens

“The order to ‘love thy neighbor as thyself’ is too extreme and too strenuous to be obeyed.”

This is one of the lines from Christopher Hitchens’ book “God Is Not Great.”  It’s not a small thought or some quippy, dismissive jab; Hitchens sincerely believed that the strain of christian moralism hurt people mentally and emotionally… and I agree with him.  For this reason and many others, I’m deeply thankful for the work of Christopher Hitchens.  

Reading Hitchens exposed for me the difference between playing a game against the practice squad in practice drills vs actually getting hit in the mouth by an opposing team; I had to mean what I said and know what I meant when I made crazy religious claims like “prayer works,” or that I was “born again” or even that “God is good.”  His work forced me to face my religious claims and practices from outside my tradition and honestly, critically evaluate what it is I believe wholeheartedly vs what I only claim to believe.  In doing so, he performed a service that very few within my tradition either can or will perform; to sincerely challenge the roots of faith without the safety net of cherishing that faith. 

-His challenge that religion does not make people more “moral” led me to see the difference between learning to live well and learning to “be good.” I recognized that I do not believe that religion makes people moral and furthermore that it should not be the goal of religion to do so.

-His challenges regarding the effectiveness of prayers for healing led me to far more critically receive such claims and more fully rejoice when I come to believe them true.  

-His challenge that religion gives license for all kinds of destructive acts led me to deeply re-evaluate the ways I justify aspects of my own behavior in light of my calling or vocation.  I’d not previously dealt with how serious a thing poorly practiced religion is and that it really does destroy lives.

When a pastor, speaker or chaplain presents a challenging question, those in attendance know that, in the end, the issue will be resolved; much in the same way a crisis is presented in an adventure film. We all know that somehow, Borne or Bond or Batman is going to make it out alive, get the girl and defeat the bad guy.  But with Hitchens, this was and is not the case; He believed firmly that religion was not only false but damaging.  Hitchens wasn’t asking questions in order to prepare the faithful for conversations they might have “out there in the world,” he was telling the Truth as he saw it and challenging those in opposition to either prove that it was not or change the way they thought and lived.  Such a confrontation and conversation has been priceless for my faith to be sincere and be fully lived.

I am better for having read, watched and listened to Christopher Hitchens.  I am clearer on the difference between believing in God with all the challenge, mystery and internal conflict that comes from such a belief and settling into a kind of faith that dismisses critique as blasphemy only. 

CMY(K): Must Be Hell On You (“C”, Track 5), A Letter To A ‘Lost’ Friend

Several of the songs that make up the CMY(K) project are written for and about friends. I am posting the letters I’ve written to these friends letting them know about their song.  Below is the letter I wrote to a friend whose loss of faith came at the cost of our friendship to some degree. Not because we didn’t want to converse about our differences but because, after years of Christ being the foundation of our love for one another, we lacked the language with which to rebuild. I wrote the song “Must Be Hell On You” for this friend.  The song appears on the EP “C” and you can listen to it at the Vimeo player below.

—–

You may recall a conversation a while back during which I mentioned that part of my next project was written with you in mind. The attached song “Must Be Hell On You” was specifically written for you.  I’ve actually been sitting on it since early 2008.  I needed time to figure out what the song was about for me and the more I realized what I’d written, the more inappropriate it felt to simply drop it on an album without writing to you about it.  It’s not just a song for you or about you; it’s a way for me to reconcile.

 

I miss you in my life. I think you know that but you have never heard me say it.  I specifically miss the place you had in my life for many years.  I remember talking on the phone after reading the embarrassing letters Christians had written to Richard Dawkins.  I told you on the phone that you were one of the few friends in my life who helped me feel normal as a person of faith. You shared that I played the same role for you. That short list is much, much shorter without you on it.

I remember the way your dramatic life-change was, for years, the clearest evidence of God I knew. I know now what kind of pressure that placed on you.  I also know, only now, what an impact it has had on me that you no longer attribute that change to God. Only as time has passed and we’ve grown more distant have I noticed how much I lost when you, for lack of a better term, ‘lost your faith.’

I’ve never blamed you for “walking away.”  Actually, I’ve never thought of it as “walking away”. I know it wasn’t a matter of simple pride or your inability to deal with some tragedy. I know that, at some point, you simply realized that you no longer believed. It would have been easier for me (maybe even for you) if something had happened which we could sit down and work through.. but there was nothing like that. In fact, that was just it.. at some point there was nothing where all along you believed there was Something.  I have never really known what to do with that… I wish I didn’t feel like I ‘lost you’ when that happened, but in some way I did.

Up to this point this is only a confession. One you have been owed for a long time. But it’s not all of why I wrote the song.  As I started off saying, I wrote this song as a way of reconciling; reconciling thoughts and feelings within me but also, hopefully reconciling with you.

While I don’t propose to entirely empathize with you (you know that I’ve had my fair share of faith crises) I wanted you to know that I have some sense of what you have lost as well.  When your faith crisis ceased to be a crisis and became a verdict, you lost a community and you lost God.. at least what you thought was God for so many years.  And so… I wanted to honor you, as you are, with this song because you are my friends and I love you.

Here are a few things I’d like you to know about “It Must Be Hell On You”:

-I wrote the song from your perspective instead of mine.
-I crafted the verses from bits of conversation we’ve had.
-I tried to simply tell your story without making an allowance or excuse… because I don’t need you to “come around” in order to see Truth in your story and in you.


You can pick up the EP at iTunes.
It is also available at my web store.
For more on the whole CMY(K) project, visit the CMYK info page.

 

 

Weird_Dog_Fight

No, YOU Shut Up: What Is “Good”? (part 2)

This is the continuation of a conversation between myself and a friend who is an atheist/naturalist.  He and I agree on Batman and beer. We disagree on issues of religion and whether or not Chis Evans made a good Captain America. We’ll be trading questions and answers on our blogs regarding issues of atheism, naturalism and religion. Yesterday, I addressed a few side-issues in Lance’s post regarding “good.”

Now, to the main point… I originally asked “Can you describe the “good” religious faith is an obstacle to?”


You wrote… “good is what’s beneficial to us as a species

I would agree. Yet, you have not accounted for why it would be good for humanity to survive. You assume we ought to.  In other words, at the root of your definition of “good” is an assumption about the basic value of human life; that it is worth preserving. This assumption is not arrived at by way of reason.  I would suggest that it is, in fact, the root from which reason grows and without which reason becomes every inch the terrifying tool religion or economics can be.  The brick mill owner who enslaves his workers has every reason to do so in light of the profits cheap labor helps him bring in. He does not offend reason by enslaving people.. his end is profit and cheap labor simply makes sense.  What is offended is a basic assumption of what people are worth or what people are for. People ought not be valued only for their utility. The life of a child ought not be compromised for the sake of profit. Reason does not tell me this; I assume it. And without that assumption, I can reason myself to just about anything.

You pointed out a handful of the atrocities humanity has perpetrated upon itself in your post.  All of these things are tragic for the very reason that they are a departure from basic value. In other words, if the Crusades were tragic or wrong (and I agree they were), it is because the freedom to choose is of value and was corrupted/compromised/broken.  Likewise, if Kamikaze piloting or the attaches on 9/11 are tragic or wrong, it is because human life is of value and was corrupted/compromised/broken.

If I do not make an assumption about the basic value of human life, then the only reasonable way to evaluate the goodness of Kamikaze piloting is whether or not it helps win a war. You are suggesting that, regardless of it’s strategic impact, something about using flying planes into populated areas is bad. Yet you’ve not given me a foundational reason to think so. You’ve assumed that life should be more important than that.

Alongside the travesties you cited, consider some even greater and more pervasive atrocities propagated by the species we ought to preserve…

…a species that compromises the quality of life of some for the simple or even sick pleasures of others (ex. cheap labor, indentured servitude and sex slavery.. est. 27million people worldwide).

…a species that allows half of it’s population to live in destitute poverty (est. 900mil. people without access to clean drinking water).

…a species that often takes the best of its fruits and uses them for the worst of it’s intentions (nuclear, chemical warfare).

…a species that largely disregards the well-being of the planet upon which it lives, even to the detriment of its own survival.

…a species that seemingly invents ways to hurt itself (smoking, fast food,.. Ke$ha).

What makes such a species worth preserving?

In an early episode of Battlestar Galactica (the greatest show in the history of television), one of the cylons asks a powerful question to the commander of the Galactica.  After years and years of war between cylons (created by humanity) and humanity, the cylon asks if humanity  has ever asked itself why it deserved to survive… poignantly, the commander does not have an answer.

Note that I am not at all pointing at a Divine Source for value; only that there seems to be something more basic than reason by which we come to understand, albeit incomplete, what “good” is.

Your example of helping a blind woman without having been told to contains the same assumption. You wrote… “Nobody and no deity needs to tell me that. I can figure it out for myself.” But you didn’t figure it out. “I should help blind women” is not a conclusion you came to after years of study and careful consideration of societal norms and/or cost-benefit analysis.  Something about passing up on that opportunity would offend the basic value you and I both stand on when we critique our world. We refer to the same basic value.. the same universal good.  It is when, for whatever “reason,” be it economic, religious or otherwise, one of us deviates from such that basic thing that we start to use see actions as “bad” or “wrong.”

—-
Question:  You wrote…“whatever is helpful for the greatest number of people is what’s good.” I honestly don’t understand this and could use an example of where or how you see this played out.  It sounds like the kind of thing that could spell trouble for minority groups like the elderly, who make up only about 8% of the earth’s population and take a great deal of money, time and energy to care for. Can you please elaborate?

5dbcb5f6ce40ae82cec2646cc256a093

No, YOU Shut Up: What Is “Good”?

This is the beginning of a conversation between myself and a friend of mine who is an atheist/naturalist.  He and I agree on Batman and beer. We disagree on issues of religion and whether or not Chis Evans made a good Captain America. We’ll be trading questions and answers on our blogs regarding issues of atheism, naturalism and religion, beginning with the question I posed to him:

You’ve stated that religious faith is bad for people. This implies some kind of good; a universal good, at that. Can you describe the “good” religious faith is an obstacle to?  Is it a universal good; can it be applied to all people?

You can read Lance’s full response here.  Below I respond to his response… 
—-

Lance,

There are too many points in your post to address in a single response.  Your critiques of faith particularly deserve some attention. We should plan on digging into some of them separately. For now, I am going to post one response today and one tomorrow. I will use this first post to touch on a few things I think need addressing and then tomorrow post a response regarding the original main point, which was establishing some description of what “good” religious faith keeps people from, thereby making it “bad for people,” as you stated in your intro.

Firstly, regarding the blanket/universal nature of my question: It stems from your statement that “religion is bad for people,” which is a universal statement. In fact, even your qualification that, for some people religion is only “as bad as a mosquito bite” while for others it is as bad as nuclear warfare still implies that it is always bad and does nothing to detract from the universal nature of your initial critique. I’m not forcing universality on you, just pointing it out in your own language.

Particular things I felt needed a response:

You wrote…“Reason will get us out of the messes that we’re in today – from global warming to figuring out how to get food to starving people.”

As I understand it, the issue with such things as hunger has never been the capacity or ability of humanity to deal with it’s brokenness, it has generally been a matter of care or will.  There has almost always been enough food in production to fill the stomachs of the earth’s in habitants.  Yet, providing that food for those who lack it is difficult… It would cost a great deal of time and money. The obstacle is the absence of a willingness to pay the price. “They” are not worth what it would cost “us.”

I’ll make it more personal: I could give more of my time, resources and money to/for the poor.  I could also greatly decrease my “carbon footprint” by never driving again and limiting my goings on to only a geography I can access by foot or bike. Yet, in either case, even though I know I would be maximizing my effectiveness by making such changes, I choose not to as a matter of convenience; I don’t want to… I don’t care enough… and reason cannot tell me why I should care.

You wrote…“While faith is not needed to do good, it is too easily used to justify bad.” / “faith gives people reason for doing bad things.”

I think you are talking about religious systems here rather than “faith” as an idea or a posture.  Regardless, what you are doing is paramount to blaming baseball as a sport for the poor performance of its teams. To say that people use something for ill purpose is to say something of people rather than the thing being used. We could (and should) quite as easily say the same about economics or political power.  For instance, countless young women and children are caught in slave-like jobs (if not outright slavery itself) because their cheap labor makes the way for cheap products to bring in enormous profits for the likes of WalMart or H&M.  Do we blame a general theories of economic or do we consider instead the motives and ill practices of those in the ranks of such companies?

Though I agree that evil behavior is far to often justified by religious sentiment, it seems that the propensity to do harm is prevalent well beyond religious boundaries.  In other words, we do “bad” things and then look for ways to justify our behavior. If it isn’t religion, it’s economics or something else. Again, this is more about something amiss in people than the tools we use to carry out our actions.

You wrote…  “…the problem with faith is that it actively encourages followers to not question.” // “Faith makes people stop asking questions.

When faith if poorly executed, it does look like this. But you grossly oversimplify “faith” here.  I’d like to write a great deal more about this in future conversations but for the time being and for the sake of focus, I’ll point at a short and very simplified reflection on faith I wrote up a few months back  and hope to return to this topic later in this conversation.

Tomorrow I will return to our main point and answer the questions Lance posed in his blog:

Do YOU think that there’s a “universal good”? If so, how do you know what it is?

If there is one, then why is there so much disagreement as to what’s good and what isn’t – even amongst people of the same religion?

If it’s impossible to know for sure the mind of a being who decides what’s good and what isn’t, then how is that different from us having to figure it out the same as if there wasn’t such a being?

 

 

ultimate-fighting-championship

No, You Shut Up: A Conversation

Much of the CMY(K) project is focused on a conversation around doubt or a lack of faith. That conversation can certainly be internal but is just as often external. In fact, few of the songs on the EP’s are written about friends who no longer  consider faith possible.  Keeping with that theme, this will be the first in a series of blog posts that will actually be a conversation with one such friend.

I’ve known Lance Johnson since I was fifteen years old and consider him a good friend. We share a great deal in common including a love for comic books, a discerning taste in beer and a half-joking distain for bad pop music.  We also share many of the same critiques of popular religion, though from different perspectives. My critique of popular religion stems from the assumption that Something True can be found or revealed in life and that bad religion makes that a harder process. Lance, as an atheist, assumes that there is no “Something True” to be discovered or revealed and that all religious effort in that direction is misguided at least and destructive at worst.

If, as a person of faith, you have had such interactions with such persons you know what I must do.  Lance must be destroyed.

Or.. we could talk. In fact, we’ve always talked quite cordially and thoughtfully about these things (imagine that?). I respect Lance’s perspective, just as he respects mine.   He and I have debated or discussed religion online in the past, back when I had a message board at my web site called “The GeekBoard.” He was “El Lancito” and I was … “Justin McRoberts.”

 

So, because we think the conversation between Christianity and Atheism important, we’re going to make a few of our conversations public.  I will begin by posing a question to Lance (below), who will answer it at his blog and finally I’ll respond to his response.  We’ll then reverse the sequence when Lance asks me a question.

We think it will be fun.

Lastly, I’m calling it a conversation for a two reasons:
1. Debates bore me. 
2. I’d like to continue lifting up the skill of listening. Debates are about hearing just enough of what someone else is saying to prepare your next point.

We think it will be enlightening (our conversations generally are enlightening and fun for us).  We also think it’s important.

 

 

 

So, Lance… my first question is; If a train leaves Chicago traveling 100MPH and another train leaves a city New York traveling 150MPH… um.. never mind.. scrap that…

ACTUAL QUESTION: You’ve stated that religious faith is bad for people. This implies some kind of good; a universal good, at that. Can you describe the “good” religious faith is an obstacle to?  Is it a universal good; can it be applied to all people?

 

 

 

 

CMY(K): Take One For The Team (“C”, Track 2)

In July of 2009, novelist Anne Rice publicly disassociated herself from Christianity because of the general impropriety of Christians. She found those who call themselves ‘christian’ to be “quarrelsome, hostile, disputatious and deservedly infamous.”

As I have written previously, I found her analysis accurate but her response to be off the mark.  Shortly after I posted the blog, I got to work on “Take One For The Team.”   Lyrics are below the video but if you haven’t checked out the digi-book we put together for the EP, I’d recommend reading the lyrics there.

You can pick up the EP at iTunes.
It is also available at my web store. 
For more on the whole CMY(K) project, visit the CMYK info page.

Take one for the team
Take it on the chin
Pick yourself back up
And brace yourself again
They don’t come to fight
They only come to win
So take one for the team
And take it on the chin

Take another step
A mile beyond the call
Bear the weight of choice
To choose something at all
At times you’ll want to stop
And times you’ll want to craw
But take another step
A mile beyond the call

Honestly, you should know
You’ve been there
Sad and low
Patience waited on you, though
So, honestly, you should know

Take a moment now
To ponder your next move
Is what you’re giving back
The honest best of you
I truly understand
You’ve got to know I doYou took one on the chin
But you were swinging, too.

 

C: Album Artwork

Many thanks to Greg Madsen for this wonderful piece of art. It is best viewed in full-screen mode. Just scroll over the booklet and click the button reading “View in fullscreen.”

cmyksimpletrans

CMY(K): Artist Statement

CMYK is a color spectrum most of us have encountered. If you’ve ever looked closely at a printed image you may have seen the tiny cyan, magenta, yellow and black dots characteristic of the CMYK color printing process. Each color is important, otherwise the printed images aren’t as vibrant as they should be. My desire with the CMY(K) project is to highlight “colors” in the spectrum of the human experience that are often regarded as too dark or even ugly when isolated. In part I’ll do this by arranging them next to  “colors” of the human experience that are more readily recognized as good, true or beautiful.

Midway through Terrence Malick’s brilliant film “Tree of Life” is a sermon in which appears the phrase “He alone sees God who sees when God turns His back as well as when He turns His face.” Those who say that God is ‘unfair’ or ‘absent’ are saying something as vital and as true as those who say that God is ‘just’ or ‘faithful.’  Therefore, experiences and expressions of disappointment or abandonment are necessary elements (colors) in a picture of the good life, rather than defects that need treatment.

Many of the songs that make up CMY(K) are stories of friends whose picture of life and God is a great deal more dappled and complicated than they expected. Some are songs for friends who no longer consider faith in God possible at all. Some are personal reflections on the facets of life that have affected these loved ones of mine.  All of them are songs that fit within the long, multicolored Christian tradition of seeing God both face to face and with His back turned.

—–

The first installment of this project is available now.

CMY(K): They Don’t Mean What They Used To (“C”, Track 1)

 

I met a young man in S. Carolina who had recently become the pastor of a church.  His father and grandfather had pastored churches before him.  The pastoralvocation was as much a part of his identity as his race or gender. He was made to serve God as a shepherd of people. Then, in the years following his installation as pastor, a series of tragedies had beset his family, including the death of their youngest daughter.  He told me that the truths he preached and sang were still true to him but that they did not mean what they had meant previously.

It was true that God was faithful.. but that did not mean God always protected young children from the harms of the world.

It was true that God was good.. but that did not mean God explained Himself or His ways.

It was true that God was real… but that did not mean it appeared that way.

He asked me if I would write he and his wife a song. That was almost seven years ago. It has taken me that seven years grasp a small piece of the frustration, confusion and courage he and his family were wrapped in.

I’ll sing these songs for you
But they don’t mean quite what they used to
I’ll sing these words to you
But only really cuz I’m supposed to

Her absence is a presence
Far more tangible than yours
Her silence has a volume
So much louder than your voice

You give me words to read
And yet my eyes are tired of reading
Light by which I can see
And yet I’ve grown so tired of seeing

Her life my greatest blessing
They say you give and take away
So as I gave I take away my praise

Cuz I can’t stop thinking about it
I won’t stop thinking about it

And so I run to you
If only to tell you that I’m leaving
What hope I’ve left in you
Is that you’ll finally hear me screaming

Cuz I can’t stop thinking about it
I won’t stop thinking about it
No, I can’t stop thinking about you
I won’t stop thinking about you


You can pick up the EP at iTunes.
It is also available at my web store.
For more on the whole CMY(K) project, visit the CMYK info page.